Ja Al Wahid Ibn Alnsrwrenegade Stables

Al-Dabbi (d.599AH/1024AD), Ibn Faradi (d.43 0AH/1013AD), Ibn Hayyan (d.469AH/1076AD), Ibn al-Khatib (d.776AH/1374AD) and Ibn al-Qutiyyah (d.367AH/77 9AD). Famous Western historians included Jose. Translated by Ismaeel Nakhuda (Translator’s foreword: Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah’s erudition in Sufism is as clear as the sun. While an expert in many types of Islamic knowledge, his solid understanding of Tasawwuf is often overlooked, as a result of which his personality is projected as dry and solely concerned with the transmitted sciences. 11-15 Abul Abbas Muhammad ibn Ibrahim ibn Ishaq al-Taleqani - may God forgive him - narrated that Abu Sa’eed Al-Husayn ibn Ali al-Adawi quoted on the authority of al-Haytham ibn Abdullah al-Rommani that Ali ibn Musa Al-Ridha’ (a.s.) quoted on the authority of his father Musa ibn Ja’far (a.s.), on the authority of his father Ja’far ibn. The genealogy of the Prophet Muhammad was the primary model used by medieval Muslim genealogists in defining Arab tribal structure. This article examines the credibility of both the overall.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Al-Muktafi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Sign your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.	Be polite and avoid personal attacks Seek dispute resolution if needed
Find sources:Google (books·news·newspapers·scholar·free images·WP refs) ·FENS·JSTOR·NYT·TWL

Al-Muktafi has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 21, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography / Military / Royalty and Nobility

(Rated GA-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
This article is supported by the military biography work group (marked as Low-importance).
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (marked as Low-importance).

WikiProject Arab world

(Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Middle Ages

(Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Islam

(Rated GA-class, Low-importance)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Iraq

(Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Military history

(Rated GA-Class)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Additional information..
Associated task forces (general topics):
Military biography task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
Middle Eastern military history task force
Associated task forces (periods and conflicts):
Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

A fact from Al-Muktafi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 4 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know.. that the six-year reign of the caliphal-Muktafi saw the Abbasid Caliphate recover the territories of Egypt and Syria, marking the last revival in its fortunes before its collapse?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/al-Muktafi.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 13, 2018.

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

This review is transcluded from Talk:Al-Muktafi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:HaEr48 (talk·contribs) 22:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

The Sermo Lupi ad Anglos (' The Sermon of the Wolf to the English ') is the title given to a homily composed in England between 1010-1016 by Wulfstan II, Archbishop of York (died 1023), who commonly styled himself Lupus, or 'wolf' after the first element in his name wulf-stan = 'wolf-stone'. Though the title is Latin, the work itself is written in Old English. The Sermo Lupi ad Anglos The Revelation of Moses Books of Adam and Eve Septuagint Book of Job The Gospel of Nicodemus The Acts of the Holy Apostle Thomas Links Blog INTRODUCTION. This web site is dedicated in featuring rejected scripture. I hesitate to use the expression “lost books of the Bible” because none of the documents featured here. His most famous work, the Sermo Lupi ad Anglos (“Sermon of Wolf to the English”), is an impassioned call to his countrymen to repentance and reform in 1014, after Aethelred had been driven out by the Danish invasions of King Sweyn. Read More; place in English literature. The sermo lupi ad anglosrejected scriptures pdf.

Starting review on this one. Skimmed through it and overall looks good. Will try to do a detailed review today. HaEr48 (talk) 22:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

I think the article passes most of the criteria with ease. It is well-written with clear prose and correct spelling and grammar, compliant with the GA-required MoS’ses. All non-lead paragraphs are well cited, list of references are provided, and inline citations are provided for most statements required by criteria 2a (see detailed comments below for some missing inline citation), and no original research. Covers the main aspects of the topic (basically, events of his life and his legacy), written in a neutral form and stable from edit wars. Illustrated with appropriate images and no copyright issue was found.

Some specific comments:

Why is the article title 'Al-Muktafi' instead of the full regnal name Al-Muktafi billah? Is it common to drop the second part?
- Yes, that is common practice in all Western languages that I know of. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
'The imprisoned Saffarid ruler, Amr ibn al-Layth, was executed.' Could we use active voice or indicate who ordered this execution? Looking at the context it's probably the vizier, but it's better to be explicit, I think. Same for other people getting purged in the same paragraph: Badr al-Mu'tadidi, Abd al-Wahid, al-Husayn ibn Amr al-Nasrani
- Done in part, to avoid the constant repetition of 'al-Qasim'. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Could you describe who Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Kundajiq and Mu'nis al-Khadim are? e.g. by naming their position or title
- Done. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
The same for these people you quoted by name: Al-Tabari, Michael Bonner, Harold Bowen. What are their titles/affiliations? (I know al-Tabari is a well-known historian, but might as well ..)
- Done. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Could you describe what Sahib al-shurta means? It seems to be a title, but the link redirects to Shurta which was an organization.
- Done. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
As per GA criteria, could you add inline citation on these specific numbers: : “some 20,000 were reportedly killed”; “a major Byzantine army, allegedly 100,000 strong,” as well as this slightly counterintuitive statement: “most of the actual conduct of government was left to his viziers and officials.”
- Done on the first, the second is clearly attributed to Tabari, and thereby linked to the reference at the end of the section. On the latter, it essentially sums up the 'On the other hand, he was..' section. As the reign was dominated by his vizier, it is clear that Muktafi himself was not a hands-on ruler. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
'The Byzantine front' section: Could you clarify how Leo of Tripoli's campaign was related to the caliph? Was Leo under orders from the Caliph?
- Done. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
'including the capture of Qurus (Cyrrhus) in July 906'. Could you clarify which side captured Cyrrhus?
- Done. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
'Death and legacy' section: Clarify that al-Muqtadir was the same guy as the caliph’s brother Ja’far
- Done. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Who was Abdallah ibn al-Mu'tazz (another candidate for sucession)? Did he hold any post or were related to the caliph’s family?
- Done. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Could you consider adding some background to the events described in the biography? e.g. how the Qarmatians rose to prominence, how come Egypt was lost, and perhaps general description of the previous caliph's rule and his 'cruelty' mentioned in Al-Muktafi's article?
- Sure, give me a few days. Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Overall it was a very informative and enjoyable article. I even feel bad when reading that after all that accomplishments a weak caliph would take the crown. Congratulations for your work! HaEr48 (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot HaEr48 for taking the time to review this, and for your thoughtful suggestions. I've (hopefully) fixed most of the issues you raised, I'll have another look over the weekend to add some context here and there. Best, Constantine ✍ 17:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt response, Constantine, and your updates look good. Looking forward to your next update adding context. HaEr48 (talk) 19:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Any news here, Constantine? HaEr48 (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Sugars legacy stablescustom sls western saddles for sale.

Hi HaEr48, sorry, I got a bit sidetracked with my other projects in WP :). I will work on it over the next few days, though. Best, Constantine ✍ 17:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi HaEr48!. Concerning the Qarmatians, I don't know what exactly I could add. They had the advantage of using the Bedouin, and fighting against the Tulunids, who were nearing collapse, and the Abbasids, who were facing dangers all around and barely could afford to concentrate on one front at a time. Analyzing this is well beyond the scope of this article, however. I did add a bit more context on the sectarian milieu of the time, however, showing that the Qarmatians were not an isolated phenomenon. I have added more information on the situation of the Caliphate during al-Muktafi's early life, and the deeds of his father and grandfather; I've also moved the bureaucratic factions up, since they emerged under al-Mu'tadid. I think that context-wise, the article can now stand on its own two feet. Any further suggestions? Constantine ✍ 09:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the great update. Constantine. I agree, now the article sufficiently explains the context of the events in al-Muktafi's life. About Qarmatian, I'm not asking for an analysis for the Qarmatians' rise, I was thinking more of 'what events bring them to power?', which your update more than answered. I took another look at the article, I can't think of any major suggestions. Given that and the passing of the GA criteria, I will pass this nomination and update accordingly. Congratulations and thanks for the high quality interesting article! HaEr48 (talk) 18:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you once more for taking the time, and for the valuable suggestions, that have led to some major improvements! Cheers, Constantine ✍ 18:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Al-Muktafi&oldid=990789595'

< Talk:Al-Muktafi

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article(edit | visual edit | history)·Article talk(edit | history)·Watch

Reviewer:HaEr48 (talk·contribs) 22:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Starting review on this one. Skimmed through it and overall looks good. Will try to do a detailed review today. HaEr48 (talk) 22:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)